It’s been called “the pain of being a redhead”. According to research studies (Here), people with red hair need larger doses of anesthesia during medical procedures. In addition, there’s evidence that redheads are resistant to the localized pain blocker Novocain. An extension to that finding is the statistic that redheads are twice as likely to avoid going to the dentist… as other hair colors.
I know that the following scientific reasoning for hair color is a bit mind-numbing. Have you ever heard someone say that it was like looking into the eyes of Medusa and that they just couldn’t look away? Well, this is just the opposite. So, to skip boring gene stuff, skip the next paragraph.
If you decided not to skip…. the reason for hair color having bearing on response to anesthesia is based on our genes. People with brown, black and blond hair have the gene for the melanocortin-1 receptor that produces melanin. Conversely, the MC1R gene causes the production of a substance called pheomelanin which causes red hair and fair skin.
I read that “gene stuff” in several articles and wrote it down for the blog. All I know is, that it has nothing to do with Wrangler or Levi. But, the gene composition has to do with how we react to anesthetics. Which leads us to the concept of taking a person as you find them in the consideration of injuries caused by someone’s fault.
In car crash cases, the jury receives instruction on the law from the judge. In cases where a person had some prior problems, physical conditions, or a accident. It’s not unusual that there was evidence of preexisting conditions. So, the judge will read the following instruction to the jury:
If you find that the plaintiff had a condition before the collision that was aggravated as a result of the collision or that the pre-existing condition made the injury he received in the collision more severe or more difficult to treat, then if you find your verdict for the plaintiff, he may recover for the aggravation and for the increased severity or difficulty of treatment, but he is not entitled to recover for the pre-existing condition
This jury instruction is sometimes called the “Egg Shell Head” instruction. Much like Humpty-Dumpty who sat on the wall. If someone pushed him off the wall, they cannot then argue that they are not be responsible for Humpty’s injuries after “all the kings horses and all the kings men, couldn’t put Humpty together again”.
In a civil lawsuit for damages from a car crash, a defendant takes a person as they find them. We are all different, just as we all have different pain thresholds. A person must be responsible for whatever they cause, and cannot argue some weakness of the injured person as a defense. They are only responsible for what they cause or aggravate.
An aggravation of a preexisting injury or condition is really what happens in many cases as the client gets older and has dealt with the realities of life.