The Joel Bieber Firm

Call 1-800-451-6393

Archive for Litigation

The Video Deposition

Monday, May 13th, 2013

     Do you remember this Schwab investment TV advertisement? It is comparing a bad stock company to Schwab by portraying some boiler room stock-selling company in a unfavorable way. Their manager is telling all the sales people to get on the phone and pitch some crummy stock to customers by “let’s go out there and put some lipstick on that pig”.lipstick pig

     When I watch it, it still makes me laugh. It also reminds me a little bit about what sometimes happens in some of our cases. A thought on the evidence.  (Practice Alert)  I am going to tell you a blog secret between you and me!  Defense lawyers… your eyes are getting very sleepy. You better go catch a nap.   

     This involves why we video the depositions of the opposing party (defendant) on most of our cases. I am not insinuating that the other side is a pig. Just whether a jury perceives someone trying to be something that they are not. The defense attorney making their client get all  ”dressed up for court”. 

     This past week, I drove to Wytheville, Virginia, for my scheduled depositions. I was taking the defendant’s and the opposing attorney was questioning my client.  We also had the deputy who had investigated this 2010 crash. Because the defense attorney’s office was about 50 miles from the county, we agreed to have the depositions at the courthouse where the trial is scheduled.

     I showed up a little early so I could also get a look at the courtroom. Then, I was shown back to the law library where the depositions were scheduled. Soon, my client, the court reporter and videographer arrived. I had noticed the deposition for video and court reporter. The defense deposition notice was for transcription by the court reporter without any video.

     The defendant arrived before his lawyer. He was dressed in a T-shirt and jeans. Like he would normally dress everyday. Soon, his lawyer arrived. The depositions proceeded. After I had completed the first deposition, the videographer packed up and left.   

     Generally speaking, I think that people should basically dress comfortably. My grandfather was a farmer. He would always dress the way he wanted to… in overalls like a farmer. 

      In court cases, I believe that clients should basically dress in something that they normally and comfortably wear and not wear something that they would normally never wear. I think that some lawyers believe that their clients should always be dressed in their Sunday best; and if they don’t own dress clothes, they should buy some. To me, I think people act differently in clothes that they never wear.

    That takes me to why I like to videotape depositions.  In many cases, I will show the video deposition during trial. The jury usually begins watching the deposition. Then, I will sometimes notice when they look over at the defense table where the defendant is now all dressed up. Consciously or unconsciously, I think that it sends the message that the opposing party is trying to project something that they are not.

     After one trial, I even had a juror come up to me with a smile and comment on how “dressed up” the opposing party came for trial. Maybe it’s just my crazy thinking. I also think that videotaping keeps everyone more alert during the deposition and even captures the tone and pauses of the questions and answers.

     As to last week’s deposition,, it will be interesting to see if the opposing party shows up in his usual clothing or if the defense lawyer will decide to make him get “all dressed up”. 

     Hopefully, the defendant will do something to make the jury ask “why”. Then, maybe that will carry over on to the evidence. In every trial there is a truth-giver and someone who is perceived as less. I think being real about appearance might be part of that. There has to be a reason that “a picture is worth a thousand words”.  What do you think?

     For pic o’ day, I stayed with blame and evidence!!

blame

Please click the Facebook “Share” button below this post to let others know you enjoyed reading it. Thanks!

Coppertone Burned

Wednesday, September 26th, 2012

I was trying to be creative with my Coppertone blog title. The real story (Reuters) is that Merck has agreed to settle a decade old class-action suit over allegations that the company had made false claims about its Coppertone sunscreen products.

Merck purchased the Coppertone franchise in 2009, so it knew that it was taking on this litigation. It now has agreed to pay between 3 and 10 million to settle the claims that were previously brought against Coppertone, but does so with the standard settlement language of  ”denied any wrongdoing or liability”.

The lawsuit had been brought on behalf of several consumers.  The lawsuit claimed that Coppertone exaggerated claims about its sunblock sprays and lotions. As part of the settlement, Merck agrees that Coppertone products that are manufactured after June 22,, 2012 will not use the terms “sunblock”, “waterproof”, “sweatproof”, “all day”, and/or “all day protection” in the label, or in the advertising or marketing of its sunblock products.

Those that purchased Coppertone products during the class settlement period are able to claim a refund of $1.50 per purchase. As to the description of the product, I am still wondering what they will now market. How does this sound, “Product to be used for fun at the beach… that’s all” or “How about some Coppertone that doesn’t guarantee”?

For pic o’ day, my mom sent me this one. Good voice marketing!

Please click the Facebook “Share” button below this post to let others know you enjoyed reading it. Thanks!

Categories : Defective Products
Comments (1)

Baseball Cards in the Attic

Monday, July 16th, 2012

     It’s a story about finding the unexpected. It’s better than reaching into the winter coat pocket and feeling a $5 dollar bill. Although, that’s pretty good too.

     Karl Kissner saw a soot-covered cardboard box that had been under a wooden dollhouse, in his grandfather’s attic.  When he looked inside the box, he saw baseball cards with names that were familiar: Hall of Famers Ty Cobb, Cy Young and Honus Wagner. The cards were smaller than the cards he was used to seeing.

     After seeing the box and its contents, he put them down and began going through other boxes in the attic. Later, he took the box to a card authenticator. He was soon thankful that his grandfather, who had died in the 1940′s, had not thrown them away.

     It turns out that these cards are some of the finest examples  from a set known as the E98 series. Based on the initial evaluation, the cards should bring somewhere between $2 and $3 million at auction.  You can click for the full story of the cards above.  A treasure in the attic!     

     When I saw this story, it reminded me of a call that I received a few years back. A collector told me that it had rained through the roof and destroyed all his cards. The cards were insured, but the insurance company was only offering him $18,000 and he thought they were worth a whole lot more.

     Normally, I would not take a case that did not involve an injury. But, I sometimes do take insurance claims and I was also interested in this subject matter. I have a small collection of cards too.

     I traveled down to look at the cards that were now wrinkled and wet from the rain leak. There were several boxes of cards stacked all over a room. Some had dried but they were clearly damaged.

     Initially, I had to file suit. Then, the insurance company agreed to arbitrate the loss. Strategically, I decided to hire an expert and present a case to an arbitrator instead of a jury.

     The defense lawyer and the insurance adjuster put little value or defense, in the client’s cardboard collection. They never did offer more than $18,000. They did base that on some thought process but I can’t remember why.

     My expert put the value of the cards at around $120,000. He also was someone known in the sports collecting field because he regularly wrote a column for a Sports Card Company publication.

     I suspect that you have already guessed that I was pleased with the outcome. Yes… I was! The arbitrator came back with a verdict of $98,000 for the cards.

     My client was disappointed in his card loss but pleased in the result. The insurance company said that they would agree to make payment on the verdict. Then, they wanted the cards as well. Finally, they agreed that they really didn’t want “all those moldy cards”. 

     I found a few that still could be recognized. My client threw almost all of them out but he gave me a couple as a souvenir of our case. It wasn’t a treasure from the attic, but I guess it was “”pennies from heaven” in the form of rain. 

     Pic o’ day is one of those that keeps making me smile. Imagine if you saw this on the neighbor’s porch:

 

Please click the Facebook “Share” button below this post to let others know you enjoyed reading it. Thanks!

Comments (1)

Bloomberg’s and AP Hormone Therapy Update

Friday, May 13th, 2011

The following is from a Bloomberg News and AP update on Hormone Therapy payments.  Our Firm is still in the middle of this litigation.  Pfizer purchased Wyeth about 2 years ago, which is why it is interchangeable in this article.

The AP (5 1/2, Johnson) reported that Pfizer “recorded charges totaling $472 Million as it reached agreements to settle about one-third of the lawsuits it faces” over whether hormone-replacement therapy (HRT) drugs made by its “Wyeth subsidiary caused breast cancer or other harm to women.”  In an  SEC filing “late Thursday, Pfizer said it took a $172 million charge in the first quarter to cover those agreements, plus verdicts in lawsuits it has lost.”  The pharmaceutical company also “recorded a $300 million charge in the quarter for the minimum expected costs to resolve all of the other outstanding hormone-replacement therapy actions against Pfizer and its affiliated companies.”

Bloomberg News (5/13, Feeley) reports that in February, Pfizer had “agreed to pay about $330 million to resolve 2,200 cases over the menopause drugs, according to people familiar with the accords.”  Overall, Pfizer’s “Wyeth and Upjohn units have lost eight of the fifteen Prempro [conjugated estrogens and medroxyprogesterone] cases decided by juries since trials began in 2006.”

Please click the Facebook “Share” button below this post to let others know you enjoyed reading it. Thanks!

Comments Comments Off

A Milkaholic Settlement

Tuesday, September 21st, 2010

     Is the glass of milk half empty or half full. It’s hard too tell.  As a follow- up to a previous blog, Lindsay Lohan and E-Trade have settled the lawsuit that had been brought by Lohan.  

     If you’re keeping score at home, it seems that Lindsay got little more than embarrassment. The case of Lindsay Lohan versus E-Trade was filed in March, because of an E-Trade ad that had  a baby named “Lindsay”. While Lindsay has never been associated with investing, she apparently thought that they were taking aim at her by calling the baby, named Lindsay, a “Milkaholic”.

     Well, this riveting litigation has been settled, with Lohan receiving “a little money out of the deal”. It’s hard to believe that I devoted two blogs to this lawsuit but the combination of the E-Trade ads, and this subject matter just keeps pulling me back for more. No word yet on whether the local Italian restaurant is being sued for their menu item “Lohan Bourbon Lasagna”.

Please click the Facebook “Share” button below this post to let others know you enjoyed reading it. Thanks!

Categories : Uncategorized
Comments Comments Off

Point of View Attacks

Monday, April 26th, 2010

     I stood proudly on my toes as the song leader directed us to a hymn of praise. Unfortunately, I was too young to read the words but it didn’t stop me from pretending. As loud as I could, or at least as loud as could be expected of any 4 year old, I sang “Lead on o kinky turtle, the month of March has come”.

     Hopefully, I was blending in with the rest of the congregation. I certainly wasn’t trying to be disrespectful to the song. However, that’s how the words, “Lead on O King Eternal, the day of march has come“, sounded to me.  From my point of view, with head barely at eye level to the pew, I was seeing and hearing and singing it, with great determination.

     I am now going to tackle a controversial topic that involves the allegations of child abuse and the Catholic Church. Normally, I don’t dip into tremendous controversy, but in my eyes, it is really hard to see any defense for any of that conduct. Usually, the reason that I read the articles on these events really relates to my questions of “Who knew what and when?” In addition, was there an intent of cover-up, from those in high places.

     As a law firm, we have not been involved in any of these claims or litigation. In that context, I was interested to read a CNN article that identifies one specific lawyer as the driving force behind this litigation. Based on the article, it is thought that he is responsible for a big chunk of the $2.5 billion dollars, that has been paid by the US Catholic Church, to date, to settle sex abuse cases.

     Here is where I am fascinated by the point of view. Those defending the church as spokesmen or lawyers, attack this lawyer. They basically say that he is more interested in publicity than justice. As the President of the Catholic League for Civil Rights put it,  that lawyer “has sued the Vatican many times and never won”. The Vatican’s lawyer says that Jeff Anderson, the lawyer responsible for these lawsuits and the ones now proceeding against the Vatican directly, says that Anderson lawsuit has no merit and is just a publicity stunt to rehash old claims. (Associated Press) I guess “winning” is not the same as making them pay settlements. Another point of view.   

     I have condensed these articles into a brief blog. I think it’s something worth thinking about. On one hand, there is a lawyer that has made it his practice, since the early 80′s, to hold the Catholic Church accountable for the actions of Priests such as the Massachusetts Priest, James R. Porter, who admitted to having molested some 50-100 children. On the other hand are those who believe that this lawyer is nothing but a publicity hound whose motives have no good basis in fact, because he is attempting to blame the Vatican for things for which there is no responsibility.

     In the play “King Henry VI”, William Shakespeare penned the words that that have been repeated, almost as a joke, to clean up society by “The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers”. In fact, the context of the scene and lines was Dick the Butcher adding to the promises of   the traitor, Jack Cade.   What was really being said is not to clean up society by getting rid of all the lawyers; but this was a method, to make sure that tyranny would rule.

     I have seen many surveys on what the general public thinks of lawyers. Usually, the statistics show that lawyers are thought of in line with politicians and used car salesmen. Many people, though, will say that they don’t like lawyers but they like their lawyer. In the context of this story, it seems that this one lawyer, Jeff Anderson, has made a difference. He has made a difference in accountability and, I don’t think that attacks or him, his motives or his methods, carry much weight when it involves these horrific allegations of child abuse.  I hope you’ll let me know your thoughts from your perspective.

Please click the Facebook “Share” button below this post to let others know you enjoyed reading it. Thanks!

Categories : General Law
Comments (4)

Hormone Therapy Ruling

Thursday, January 21st, 2010

Yesterday I posted a quick blog on testimony of a defense expert. Wyeth (now owned by Pfizer) had called an expert to attack the medical testimony for the global hearing regarding all upcoming hormone therapy trials in Philadelphia. Since our firm has one starting in April, with the jury being selected in March, this ruling would have a direct impact on this upcoming trial.  

As set forth by a news story in "The Legal Intellligencer", Dr. Lewis A. Chodosh, a professor of cancer biology at the University of Pennsylvania, testified for the defense. Chodosh said that differential diagnosis "is the heart and soul of what it means to be a physician." But Chodosh said that the typical breast cancer has many different pathways stimulating its growth, and differential diagnosis cannot isolate which growth pathway is the cause of a patient's cancer. He said more than 95 percent of breast cancers have unknown causes.

Analyzing this drug company's defense is sometimes like eating dry cereal, it's just hard to get through. However, in the context of what they are trying to do, they keep "running out" a defense to try, to see if it might work. For several trials, they had an expert who testified that she found cancer in each of the women at trial, before any hormone therapy was taken. She found cancer, contrary to any other medical testimony or treating doctors in each case. Those juries did not find her very persuasive, so I guess, that we will continue to hear new stories as a defense. Fortunately, the Judge did not find this testimony persuasive either. 

Please click the Facebook “Share” button below this post to let others know you enjoyed reading it. Thanks!

Categories : Drug Reactions
Comments (1)

Salt Harms

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2009

Last week, as the snow was descending on the house and yard, it looked beautiful. I was out in it with my "camera phone", taking pictures. It was a white Christmas and I could almost hear Bing Crosby singing in the backyard.

This morning, the snow wasn't as fun. As I drove out of my driveway, I got stuck. I spent the next half hour turning, reversing and driving forward, to escape the ice. I even got the amazing idea of using the other car to push it out of the rut. Of course, I was only to blame because I had not done any shoveling. I've always heard that snow shoveling is really worse on your heart than eating lard. I'm staying with that idea, too.

It shows how things have changed. I remember people strapping on chains to the tires. Now, everyone has fancy tires that are supposed to dig in the snow. Many cars have all wheel drive. Truck drivers are not the only ones going the speed limit now, in the winter.

I also remember all the salt that was spread on the highway. Road salt was always supposed to make it easy for the snow plows and helped to keep the roads from freezing. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, 15 million tons of salt was used in the USA last year. Plus, since it's "natural", shouldn't we feel good about it?

Well, of course, it makes the blog because we now know that it causes problems. A Google search brings articles on salt harm; some more than 10 years old. We now know that melting snow and ice causes the salt to run off on to vegetation, soil, streams and rivers. The runoff kills fish and vegetation and has even been found in residential drinking water. Fortunately, some other alternatives are being used and Scientists are working on new ideas.

In the practice of law, you sometimes find out information in litigation that might not be helpful, but is interesting. For instance, when someone broke into a Tylenol manufacturing plant and added poison to some of the bottles, deposition questioning showed that the cotton in those bottles, served no purpose. It was only there because consumers would not buy the tylenol without it. People thought that cotton kept them fresh. So, every bottle was manufactured with "fake fresh cotton". Of course, good also came out of that litigation, because safety caps were installed.

   Knowledge that someone could break into a medicine bottle caused changes. Knowledge that salt can cause harm that is long term, is also now instituting change. What has been acceptable for years does not make it right. Now, I just need to learn how not to get stuck in my own driveway!   

  

Please click the Facebook “Share” button below this post to let others know you enjoyed reading it. Thanks!

Comments Comments Off

Year End Negotiations

Monday, December 21st, 2009

Louis "Satchmo" Armstrong used to tell the story about a scare that he had in his dressing room, one night. "This big hood crashed into my dressing room in Chicago and instructs me that I will open in such and such a club in New York, the next night. I tell him I got this Chicago engagement and don't plan traveling. I turn my back on him to show that I'm cool and I hear SNAP! CLICK!"

Armstrong continued, "I turn around and he has pulled this big revolver on me and cocked it. It looks like a cannon. I look down at it and it looks like death. Then I say, 'maybe I do open in New York tomorrow.'"  In describing that story in the "Secrets of Power Negotiating", the author links it with a quotation from Al Capone. "You can get much farther with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone."

Yesterday, my wife Jackey was baking cookies. I became the official taster. I would run down during the football games and grab another. This morning, I weighed myself and had lost some weight over the weekend. So, I negotiated with myself and ate a few more cookies at work. I think I won that negotiation. It also shows that life is about a negotiation. Obviously, it doesn't have to be about violence, but there are pressure points in every negotiation and the year end can have some of that.

Recently, an adjuster remarked that she was taking some time off that day, to take her daughter shopping. I had to bite my tongue because sometimes I wonder if these adjusters have a human side to them. Just as I probably get biased against insurance companies and their methods, I see adjusters who have become so feisty, that they lose sight of the human loss. It seems, to me, as though it's just another file. Especially when they joke about the injuries.

My email "in box" is filled with cases that are in litigation. Some resolve through settlement. Drug Company Schering-Plough agreed to settled a claim that was brought by the State of California, that the drug company deliberately inflated its wholesale price for the drug Albuterol, causing Medicaid to overpay millions in in pharmacy reimbursements.(Bloomberg) . A gun didn't cause the settlement but, I'm sure, possible prosecution may have had leverage.

Teddy Roosevelt said, "Speak softly and carry a big stick". In the world of law, about the only thing that is a threat is a possible verdict that exposes that defendant/insured to personal asset responsibility, that would be above the coverage amount. In South Carolina, if the verdict is well in excess of the offer, the presumption is on the insurance company to prove that they evaluated and negotiated in good faith. In Virginia, there is very little threat of that. In addition, politicians have been reticent to enact any kind of meaningful bad faith laws. They just remind that Virginia was picked 1st in business by Forbes Magazine.

For now, some companies do want to settle claims to close them out in this year end push. Others are seemingly avoiding any attempt at settlement. As one adjuster put it after offering 14K on a 13K medical bill/clear liability case, "it's just what I think it's worth". When I pushed her on why she thought it was only worth one thousand above medical bills on a crash that totaled the vehicles, she had no answer. It was obvious that our negotiations had come to an end. And so it is, year end negotiations. I'm still looking for Teddy Roosevelt's big stick.   

Please click the Facebook “Share” button below this post to let others know you enjoyed reading it. Thanks!

Categories : Auto Accidents
Comments Comments Off

Wyeth Verdicts

Monday, November 23rd, 2009

On October 26, a Philadelphia jury returned a punishment damage verdict in the case of Barton v. Wyeth. This, on the heels of a 3.7 million compensatory verdict that had been entered against Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, for the actual damages that Mrs Barton had suffered, from taking the Wyeth hormone therapy drug, Prempro. Because another hormone therapy trial against Wyeth was going on a few doors down in the same courthouse, the Judge sealed the punitive damage verdict until the conclusion of the other pending case.  However, as of today, that verdict has been unsealed to reveal a $75 million dollar punitive verdict.

On Friday, in the case of Kendall v. Wyeth, the jury returned a verdict of $6.3 million with Wyeth being responsible for 60% of the verdict and Upjohn Pharmaceutical, responsible for 40%. (Story) Today, the jury returned a punitive verdict to be added to the $6.3, in an amount of $16 million against wyeth and $12 million against UpJohn for a total punitive verdict of $28 million, making the sum total verdict in Kendall to be $34.3 million.

Under our hormone therapy update section, I am also providing a listing of the verdicts that have been compiled in the hormone therapy cases. (Download Jury Verdict List) As previously blogged, Wyeth has listed a "scorecard" that did not sync with this listing. However, I think that it is difficult for them to ignore the last three verdicts that have been significant findings of fault against them. In addition, I am attaching a short video (5m:15sec) that also gives a news type update that is being sent to news stations. It's true that a picture is worth a thousand words; so this video is certainly worth more.

 

Please click the Facebook “Share” button below this post to let others know you enjoyed reading it. Thanks!

Categories : Uncategorized
Comments Comments Off