The Joel Bieber Firm

Call 1-800-451-6393

Archive for Personal Injury

A Trial Report

Wednesday, May 8th, 2013

     Let me tell you the story about my jury trial last week. Usually, I don’t mention trial results because the bar, rightfully so; wants lawyers to always include disclaimers that each case is different and no result means a guarantee for another case. This result shows why each case is different.

     Kim Raab and I showed up to Richmond Circuit Court last week for a trial on a rear-end impact. Admittedly, it was a low impact case. In fact, the defense had blown up a picture of our car that was two-foot by three-foot big. Get the picture? The question was whether we could prove that our client’s upcoming back surgery resulted from this impact.

     The jury was instructed that the defendant was only responsible for the injuries (harms) that she had caused. An aggravation of a preexisting injury meant that the defendant could be responsible for only the aggravation.

     The first day of trial (Thursday), the judge kept going until about 8:45 p.m. The jury was escorted to their cars. I had packed up my things and was headed to my car. (I am about to digress!) When I got there… I had a flat tire. I said to myself, “Self, seriously?”. I looked around and realized that no one was in the garage. Plus, you had to basically drive a special way to get out of the lot. No AAA wrecker would be able to get to me.

     I know, you are wondering if I changed the tire myself. Well, I must be honest… No. My excuse is that it takes some kind of special tool. The reality is…well, you know the reality. So, I drove very slowly to a nearby hotel and got the tire changed. Now, back to the trial story! Isn’t that what they call “part and parcel”?

     After all the evidence was in. After all closings were done and jury instructions were read to the jury. They retired to deliberate and I went to sit down outside the courtroom, and wait.

     After about ninety minutes, I heard the buzzer and thought that we had a jury verdict. Then, the bailiff said that the jury had sent out questions and we were to go to the judge’s chambers. (office). The judge then read from a yellow piece of paper that the jury had sent out. The paper had a question that indicated that a juror had spoken to someone about the case that was not part of the jury. This, against the judge’s specific instructions.

     Since this is becoming an epistle, let me cut to the end. When the judge called the jury out to inquire about the question, he concluded that a juror had potentially not followed his instructions. The judge declared a mistrial. That means… we have to reset it for trial and try it all over again in front of a new jury. Mistrial… it is the second worst word that I could hear. Well, maybe the third. Those words? The word “defense” in front of verdict; and the word “Denied” on a judge’s ruling of importance.

     A trial report with nothing to report. No result. Only part… no parcel.

     Pic o’ day reminds that some things just don’t make sense:

turning

Please click the Facebook “Share” button below this post to let others know you enjoyed reading it. Thanks!

Categories : Auto Accidents
Comments Comments Off

Philip Corboy Impact

Tuesday, June 12th, 2012

     At 3:30 am on June 12, 2012, Philip Corboy passed away at his Chicago residence, with  his wife by his side. He was 87 years old.

I knew of him as a legend in personal injury law, even before I attended law school. I tried to read anything that he would write or was written about him, because he was known as one of the great trial lawyers.

In Illinois, he successfully worked to get laws passed that  banned smoking in elevators. Nationally, he had impact when he caused the drug industry to adopt tamper-resistant packaging; as a result of his representation of families relating to the Tylenol poisoning cases in 1982.

On a personal level to lawyers, I remember that he wrote that he would never hire a lawyer who wore a toupee, because he believed that juries would consciously or unconsciously believe that the lawyer was hiding something.

In a “Super Lawyer” publication article, a former associate at his firm said that he required all lawyers at the Firm to clear their desks at the end of the day. He believed that it kept them more organized. Many former associates indicate that they have maintained that practice through the years.

The ABA Journal has quoted Illinois Appellate Judge Terrance Levin, former Corboy clerk in the 80′s, as calling Corboy the “Jack Nicklaus of lawyers”.

If you google his name,  you will see many accomplishments. Loyola University named its Law Building after him.  In 2002, Chicago Magazine compiled a “Tough Lawyer” list and attributed that quality to him. They said that he was the “type of lawyer that you did not want to see in the Courtroom… unless he was on your side”.

His Legacy is one of great influence. The Firm website lists many of his accomplishments. It also adds that:

When asked about his legacy, Phil said “personal injury trial lawyers are in the rare position of being able to level the playing field to help people in the war against organized money: insurance companies, corporations, healthcare providers, common carriers, manufacturers, cities, states and government.”

For pic o’ day, I felt it worthwhile to post a picture that makes me smile,  but one that also ties in to the toughness attributed to this great lawyer.

Please click the Facebook “Share” button below this post to let others know you enjoyed reading it. Thanks!

Categories : Misc., The Human Spirit
Comments (5)

Slip and Fall Caution

Sunday, March 18th, 2012

 

This weekend, I drove over to my parents’ house, to pick them up for Saturday lunch. I parked in the road, right up against their yard.

As we left their house and walked toward the car, we walked down the slight incline of the yard. I reminded both of them to walk very carefully because of the hill. We even were looking down at the grass, because they had just had it seeded and aerated. One area  was was a bit bald (yes, I don’t like using that… even in describing grass) and we all wanted to make sure that we steered clear of it. It had grass seed all in and around it.

     As I closed both passenger car doors, I began to step backwards. I was looking down to my left to make sure that I didn’t specifically step into that patch. Within an instant, I was down on the ground. Even with the care that I was taking, I still fell and scratched myself up a bit. All of a sudden it happened so fast and it happened to me.

     This past Friday, the Firm settled a case for a significant amount, relating to a fall near a boating dock.  When the client first fell, the rest of the family laughed because of the awkwardness of the fall. Very quickly, it became very clear that this was no simple fall and that our soon to be client was seriously hurt.

     Within the last couple of weeks, the firm has undertaken representation, with significant injuries; from slip, trip and falls. Even  family members have fallen and others have come very close.  I thought I’d just jot some notes down for the blog.

     The government’s Center for Disease Control (CDC) state over one million Americans suffer slip, trip and fall each year and as many as 17,000 in the U.S. die annually from these injuries. It is the #2 leading cause of injury.

     The National Resource on Aging and Injury (NRCAL.org) estimates that every 35 minutes, an older adult dies as a result of a fall. The Research Institute, using the Government’s Bureau of Labor statistics, records that slip and fall injuries are the most disabling in the restaurant industry. In that same study, it was estimated that 104 million workdays are lost per year, from such injuries.

     The National Floor Safety Institute breaks down reports of slip and fall accidents in the following pie chart:

 

      I don’t want to make this blog all about statistics. The University of Florida has a good site (here) on how to prevent injuries from slips, trips and falls.

     The site reminds of the importance of wearing the correct shoes, that include fitting and traction. Proper housekeeping can help reduce falls in the home.

     Paying attention and not being distracted; or holding on to the railings of steps all are logical reminders. One last mini-list in the article was learning how to fall.

     1. Tuck your chin in, turn your head and throw an arm up. It’s better to land on an arm than your head;  2. While falling, twist or roll your body to your side.  Better to land on your buttocks and side than your back;  3. Keep your wrists, elbows and knees bent and don’t try to break your fall with your hands or elbows. Try to spread the impact of the fall across as many square inches of your body as possible.

     An old TV show about police day-to day activities was called “Hill Street Blues”. Every show would begin with the morning roll call of the police precinct. At the end of announcements, Sergeant Esterhause would pause and then say, “Hey, let’s be careful out there”.  For all of us… a good reminder.       

      And Pic o’ day is a reminder about helping each other :)

 

 

Please click the Facebook “Share” button below this post to let others know you enjoyed reading it. Thanks!

Comments (6)

StopLight Camera Help

Thursday, February 2nd, 2012

Two years ago, I was handling a case best described as “he said-she said”. It was my client’s word versus the defendant as to who had the green light. My client was adamant that the other driver had ignored the red light, but we were getting nowhere until the depositions.

When I had filed suit, I had also subpoenaed all records and notes of the officer and also of traffic engineering. Prior to suit, I had only received the accident report. Sometime during litigation, I received an envelope that included a disc. As they say when something important occurs…. “Lo and behold”, on the disc was footage from the red light cameras.

The deposition of the defendant went something like this. “Let me show you a picture from the scene of the crash”. Defense attorney piped in, “Objection, crash is inflammatory”. (me just shaking my head).

The defendant driver looked at the photos and mumbled something not audible. I said, “you’ll have to speak up so the court reporter can transcribe your testimony”. The defendant repeated, “It looks like it”.

I continued, “And is that your car going through the intersection, right before it crashed into my client’s Toyota?”. He stared long and hard, Yes”.  The questioning continued, “And would you look closely at the light right above your car and tell me the color of the stop light facing you?”.

I think you know where I’m headed with this. Yep, the defendant had to admit that his light was red. I was thankful that there was a camera on that “red-light”. The deposition ended shortly after that.  As the defense attorney left my conference room,  he told me that he’d call soon. He did… we settled.

I remembered that story when I saw another stoplight camera story from Florida. A rancher  lost 12 of his cattle when they were stolen from a pasture. It was a major financial hit because of the future benefit from the cattle. As he said, “a whole lifetime of work goes right down the drain”.

He reported the stolen “property” but never expected to recover them, because three years earlier, 30 cattle were stolen from another pasture and never seen again. Police from Polk County surprised him with a call. The thieves were seen on a traffic camera with the cattle hitched to a trailer.

Unfortunately, the cattle were sold before they could be recovered, but the thieves were apprehended and the cattle owner has a possibility of receiving restitution compensation; as part of their conviction and sentencing. All because of the cameras on the stoplights.

The next time you look up at a stoplight, check to see if there is a camera peeking down at you. Someday, you might be thankful for that eye in the sky.

OK, for pic o day, I thought I’d ask the question, “when is a good time to stop?”

Please click the Facebook “Share” button below this post to let others know you enjoyed reading it. Thanks!

Comments (4)

Winning But Losing Verdict

Tuesday, November 1st, 2011

Sometimes at dinner or a reception, someone will ask me if I am working on any exciting cases. Even as I typed that last sentence, I wondered how to respond, and that’s usually what happens when I’m asked that question.

Clients’ secrets and confidences normally put some restriction on what I can say. But, the truth is, I usually am working on “some exciting cases”.  In my mind, I define that as unusual and challenging.

The restricti0n on discussion is waived a bit, if I have filed suit. It’s odd though; I never describe a jury trial case. Maybe that’s because I’m not actually working on those right then.. Plus, my mind works like an old number 9 wash tub, which makes me forget details of  past cases, after I don’t need to know them  … first you fill it up and then you empty it when done.

So, while thinking about cases, and number 9 wash tubs, I sorta traveled down memory lane and did think about some past trials. One that specifically came to mind was the one that I always describe as “the one I won but lost”.

I had been practicing law for less than a year. Have you ever heard someone say that they “need a young lawyer who is willing to fight for me but won’t cost a lot of money”. Yep, that was me. Especially the money part; because I did not have that many cases to work on. Self-employed with more emphasis on self.

So, one day, a boy that had just enlisted in the military came to see me. He told me the story about a Navy chief  that had gotten drunk and beaten him up. He wanted me to sue the chief. I know, I should have stopped there. But a consultation only, doesn’t make for a  blog story about winning and losing.

I told him that I would take the case. I don’t even know if I understood the difference between negligence and intentional tort. The easiest way to describe that is that intentional means, NO INSURANCE is paying for the damages. That chief meant to hurt that new enlistee. Oh yes, they had both been drinking at the same place too.

I filed suit for civil damages relating to assault. The chief hired an attorney and never made an offer. That was OK, because I was ready to go to trial.

We put on our case. I cross-examined  the defendant. The jury seemed to be listening attentively; Although, while the trial was going on, I did notice that my client probably weighed 80-100 lbs. more than the defendant. That detail had previously escaped me. I just kept saying to myself…. assault has nothing to do with weight. Plus, my minister used to say, “the  freedom for your fist stops where my nose begins”.

I introduced my client’s hospital bill through him and after all the testimony, the jury got the case in about 2 hours. That included picking the jury and the Judge’s instructions.

The jury was out about 40 minutes. They came back with the verdict form in their hands and the judge asked the foreman to stand and read the verdict. “We the jury, find in favor of the plaintiff”.

My heart took a bit of a jump because I knew my client had won. The foreman went on to say, ” and award damages in the amount of $1″. I think I noticed the Judge fight a smile back.

The Judge then thanked the jury for their service and excused them. I walked my client out of the courtroom and into the hallway. I tried to give him some “glass half full” by saying that at least the jury had believed him.

He thanked me for “going to the mat for him”.  At the time,  humor was not proper, but  I thought , “look, I’ll waive my 1/3 attorney fee. You can keep the whole dollar”. Taking that case to trial made me realize that I was really a “glass half fool”.

Now, pic o’ day. It might be how I looked when the jury said “one dollar”.

Please click the Facebook “Share” button below this post to let others know you enjoyed reading it. Thanks!

Comments (1)

Performance Damages

Sunday, October 23rd, 2011

My six-year-old niece had the whole family excited about her upcoming performance. She had been practicing for weeks. She’s one that embraces performances in front of people. Last week, some of the family even traveled a couple of hours for the promised excitement.

Soon, word rippled down the family grapevine; She had fallen and had scraped her knee and wouldn’t be able to perform. All that practice and excitement now led to all of us feeling bad for her.

I’m sure she felt the knee scrape but the true “wound” was the hurt of disappointment. As for the family, we know that she will face life’s bumps and bruises, but you just wish there was a way to help her avoid them.

Early in the week, I was returning a phone call to an adjuster. I had mailed a settlement package about 30 days earlier; The package included pictures of my client’s car; her medical bills and records, and my client’s description of how the accident made her feel.

My client is almost 80 years old. She said what many of my clients tell me,”I’ve never been through something like this”. When we were discussing the fair market value of what her claim should settle for, I specifically wanted to know how she was doing from injuries, and anything else that she could tell me, when describing how this crash had effected her.

Her desciption about her injuries and recovery coincided with her medical records. She initially had pain and muscle spasms and she felt that the doctors and physical therapist had really helped. Now, she told me that “I feel much better”.

My client then went on to tell me what really had bothered her. At the scene of the crash, she was pretty shook up. The person that hit her had never said he was sorry or even checked on her. She still had vivid memories of how the accident “had scared her and how it happened so fast”.

Within a couple of days from the crash, the adjuster called her and wanted to take a recorded statement from her. She’d never had to do one of those. She was proud of the fact that she got around by driving herself and really didn’t like it when she was without a car. Fortunately, they finally got it fixed and got it back to her. She told me that she felt that she needed to “be more careful” while driving.

I finally got the insurance adjuster on the phone. He went on to recite that they knew that their insured was at fault. (Of course, he had pled guilty of failing to yield at his traffic hearing). The adjuster said that he had reviewed the records, noticed that my client had gotten better and that they were willing to pay her medical bills and throw on “a little bit more to settle it”.

The law recognizes several forms of damages. Medical bills is only one form of damage. The adjuster was acting like most adjusters and just processing. He probably had put the details of the accident in his company’s software package and the computer had told him a range of what to pay. That range didn’t recognize the fear of being in the crash; the worry of not getting better; or what it felt like to lose a bit of independence in not having your car to drive.

My niece did get hurt from her fall. But, her real loss was not being able to perform after all that practice and the anticipation build-up to that night.

Only part of the injuries from a car accident are from the physical hurt. Many Insurance adjusters that I talk to, try to only focus on medical bills and treatment. To me, it’s really the effects of the crash. Just like the performance damages of not performing, for my niece. And no, my client’s claim is not going to settle “for a little above her medical bills”. When I gave my reasons to the adjuster,  he said that “he and his supervisor will take another look at it”.

In light of that, I thought that pic o’ day should be about responsibility:

Please click the Facebook “Share” button below this post to let others know you enjoyed reading it. Thanks!

Getting Ready for a Verdict

Tuesday, September 20th, 2011

     I still get butterflies in my stomach when I am waiting for the jury verdict. Usually, I am sitting outside the courtroom on some hard wooden bench, pretending to work on my iPad or checking messages on my phone. I am sitting down the hall from the Courtroom.

     At some point, I’ll hear a voice that almost sounds like my subconscious. “The verdict is in.”  I’ll pick myself up and head back to the Courtroom. In that brief moment, I’m not sure if I am enjoying the moment or if the anticipation is a form of mental torture.

     Once I get back to counsel table, the baliff  says “all rise” and the Judge comes back to the bench.  “Are you ready for the jury to read its verdict?” After nodding, the Judge then calls the jury back from the jury room.

     As they enter the courtroom in single file, they re-take their same seats in the jury box. I watch their faces, trying to get a clue about the verdict. At the same time, I watch to see who will be holding the paper that indicates the verdict. Usually, I have tried to predict who will be the jury foreman; And, sometimes, that might give me a clue about the result.

     Last week, two lawyers involved in a Hampton criminal jury trial were spared some of the feeling of “butterflies”. In a rare circumstance, the Judge called the prosecutor and defense attorney to his chambers. There, they both learned that the jury had found the defendant guilty of second-degree murder.

     A reporter covering the trial for the Daily Press, did not know about the interaction in chambers. He did find it strange that the prosecuting attorney appeared to be in a good mood before the jury had returned. The defense attorney and defendant seemed very dejected. 

     When the jury came in, he saw the defendant and the defense attorney fail to stand. Throughout the trial, every time the jury had returned to the jury box, they had always stood; which is common courtesy.

   The reporter later learned that the parties had already been informed of the verdict. In a handwritten note to the Judge, the reporter objected to the attorneys learning about the verdict, before the general public. The judge told the reporter that “I showed them the form without comment, and there was no discussion about it”.

     The news article noted that some attorneys had speculated that the Judge had shown it to the attorneys, to make sure that there was no defect in the verdict form. Or, so that they could potentially move to sentencing without a break.

     Based on the Judge’s response to the newspaper reporter, I don’t think that either of those speculations could be accurate. It seems to me that those would require a bit of communication between the lawyers and Judge.

     When a verdict is about to be read, usually a couple of deputies are in the courtroom, and they take positions strategically around the jury box. 

     Since I only handle civil matters, perhaps judges do take a little bit different approach regarding the reading of the verdict. In civil cases, the Judge does not see the verdict until the foreman has brought it into the Courtroom.

     I’ve probably read too many Grisham novels, but I would think that a defendant or defendant’s family might act differently, if they knew that the jury was already going to say “guilty”, before they even got into the Courtroom.    Maybe I should include that in my first novel!

Now, pic o’ day

       

 

Please click the Facebook “Share” button below this post to let others know you enjoyed reading it. Thanks!

Comments (3)

The Negotiations Mystery

Tuesday, September 13th, 2011

     Erwin Lutzer recently told the story of the young boy who decided to sell a puppy,  because his mom would only let him keep one.

     The puppy had matted hair and a box that was a bit torn. Over the box, the boy put a sign that read, “Puppy for Sale 3 dollars”.

     A salesman drove by and decided that he was going to teach the boy about sales. He stopped and told him that he needed to get a clean box and to clean up the puppy for a better appearance. Plus, the price was too low.  He advised the boy to raise the price, so people would feel that they were buying something of real value.

     The next day, the salesman drove by the same street and saw the boy, the puppy and a sign that now read, “Puppy for sale $1000″. The salesman didn’t have time to stop and he could only shake his head. The boy had gone overboard with his advice.

     On the way home,  the salesman decided that he was going to stop and try to get the price down to a more realistic amount. When he got to the spot, he was surprised to see a new sign that now read, “Puppy Sold”.

     Now, the salesman couldn’t wait to talk to the boy. When he found him he asked, “You didn’t really sell that puppy for a thousand dollars,  did you?” The boy replied, “ Yes, I did.  Although it was a little different than that. I traded  the puppy in for 2 $500 cats”.

     Everyday, we are all negotiating something. It might even be in our mind whether we can have a dessert or a piece of chocolate. In the world of injury law, everyday is a negotiation, but I still get surprised by some of the offers.

     Years ago, I was involved in an accident claim that had caused serious injury. The client had lost his leg just below his knee. The amount of insurance coverage and any possible assets of the defendant should have been immediately offered by the insurance company adjuster.

     Instead, under the Rules of Evidence, they exercised their right to send the client for a defense doctor evaluation. Then, the adjuster called and extended an offer that was much less than the available insurance coverage.

     In extending the offer, she referenced that the defense doctor’s report indicated how well the client was doing well, despite the severity of the crash. One particular sentence in that defense report was probably as offensive as anything. It said, ” doing fine and the stump looks well maintained”.  Discussions during negotiation can be real head shakers sometimes.          

Here is  pic o’ day. Is this the lime in the coconut?

 

Please click the Facebook “Share” button below this post to let others know you enjoyed reading it. Thanks!

Comments (2)

The Dinosaur Insurance Thinking

Monday, May 16th, 2011

     The tour guide was taking the group to the next exhibit. He had been providing such great information that everyone in the group was staying close. Apparently, his knees weren’t hurting him like that tour guide in the Advil commercials. The group kept moving to the Dinosaurs.

     “We now come to Tyrannosauras Rex“, he said. “ This Dinosaur has been on the earth for 2 million and 6 years”. One young man with a question mark on his face and his hand in the air, leaned forward and asked, “How do you know that T-Rex has been here for that long?”

     The guide peered back at him and answered with certain tone, “Well, when I first started working here, they told me that this Dinosaur had been on the earth for 2 million years. I have been working at the museum for 6 years. That’s how I know 2 million and 6 years”.

     I just got a voice mail message from an adjuster in the medical payment division of an insurance company. They had originally denied paying my client’s medicals through her medical payment coverage. 

     When you purchase insurance; Usually, for a minimal yearly amount, you can purchase medical payment coverage that is supposed to pay your medical bills upon submission. In fact, the Virginia State Bar recommends that an attorney fee not be charged for helping clients with their medical payment coverage;  It should only be a matter of sending the bills in and receiving payment.

     It is now my experience that several insurance companies have chosen to  make it difficult in getting payment for clients. Instead they do things like send back forms, and ask that I get my client’s doctors to fill out paperwork to justify their treatment. Yea,  you can see how crazy that is. Plus, most doctors would rightfully charge just to meet about such a thing.

     Now, after that brief explanation, here’s the short “tour guide” version  of what was done. It involved military care. In a personal injury case, the government maintains a lien that should also be paid by the medical payment coverage. Early on, I usually receive notification that I agree to help  the government get paid back.

     Instead, this adjuster had orignially written that I needed to get the military doctor to fill out forms for their consideration. Othewise, “their nurse” had determined that the care was not reasonable.

     I wish I could share the joys of what I did to get some attention. Needless to say, the voice mail advised that “there had been an oversight on the submitted medical payment.  A check is on the way.”

     Unfortunately, I now am wrestling on many of these claims that should just be paid. Instead, new adjusters are told to send out form letters; Not a lot of thinking going on. I guess they would just add 6 years and say 2 milion and 6 and accept it as fact.

Please click the Facebook “Share” button below this post to let others know you enjoyed reading it. Thanks!

Comments (5)