The Joel Bieber Firm

Call 1-800-451-6393

Archive for Police

Oregon Troopers Use Facebook

Tuesday, March 26th, 2013

    “In a relationship” is now a new investigative tool in Oregon. (KATU) Oregon State Troopers had stopped a man on Interstate 5, near Lake Osweko. As soon as he passed his ID through the window, the Troopers became skeptical. The picture did not match the driver.  Then, the man said that he did not have documentation for the car because it belonged to his fiance’. More skepticism. The man then gave the Trooper the name of his fiance’. 

     The Trooper then walked back to his patrol car and performed some unique search capability for his Sunday afternoon traffic stop. The trooper decided to pull up the woman’s name on Facebook on the patrol car’s laptop. The woman listed herself as being in a relationship with Kerry Prowse. The original ID did not match the driver but the photo of Kerry Prowse on Facebook did.

     The Trooper then questioned the driver, who finally admitted that he was Prowse; a wanted fugitive from Portland. Prowse was wanted on a parole violation. His arrest resume included an arrest on suspicion of a felon in possession of a firearm, unauthorized use of a motor vehicle and unlawful possession of methamphetamine. Prowse was also cited for DUI drugs and misdemeanor driving,  while suspended. Not surprisingly, the Trooper took him back to the station. No word on whether that woman’s Facebook status has now been changed to “still searching”.

      Just like pic o’ day, everyone is now using the computer for everything!

Dog typing

Please click the Facebook “Share” button below this post to let others know you enjoyed reading it. Thanks!

Comments (5)

City Attorney Pocket Change?

Tuesday, October 9th, 2012

Do you remember the infamous song, “Pants on the Ground” from American Idol? Well, according to this news story from the Times-Picayune is a charge of “joint on the ground”.

Assistant New Orleans city attorney, Jason Cantrell, was chatting with a police officer while at the Orleans Parish Magistrate Court. All of a sudden, a marijuana cigarette fell out of his pocket and began rolling on the floor. Two police officers looked down at it and then charged him with simple marijuana possession. They called it easy police work.

Once charged, Cantrell resigned his position. His wife happens to be running for a city council seat. She came out with a statement to assure everyone that she was going to continue to run but ask that “the public respect our privacy in this very personal family matter”.

I never understand that statement. You see it with just about every news story. “Man caught stealing cough drops from zoo giraffe. Family asks that the public respect their privacy”.  OK… that might be a bit of fiction right there.

There were plenty of curious comments after the story posted above. Inexplicably, some were attacks on his wife. One said that this should be considered a personal issue but that he should have also used better sense. The poster said, “It’s like bringing an ice cold beer to court. Leave those things at home and have some decency”.  Another poster suggested that this story shows the need that all politicians should regularly be drug tested. Guess we should never let logic get in the way of a good news story!

For pic o’ day, I thought I would post the first one for pumpkin carving. Dog and cat pumpkin carving?

Please click the Facebook “Share” button below this post to let others know you enjoyed reading it. Thanks!

Guilty by a Nose

Monday, August 6th, 2012

In horse racing, you regularly hear the expression that the “horse won by a nose”. Have you ever heard of a criminal defendant who tried to get a drug charge dismissed because of a nose? That’s the story of the case styled United States v. Greene.

One morning in March, a state trooper in Roanoke activated his lights to stop a car that was traveling with excessively tinted windows and a partially obscured license plate. The patrol car camera fully documented the traffic stop.

After the car had stopped, the trooper contacted his partner to assist by bringing their drug dog to the scene. During a “free air sniff”, the dog alerted the troopers to the rear passenger panel. A search revealed a duffle bag that contained over a kilogram of cocaine and $7,000. Based on that stop and find, a grand jury indicted the driver for possession with intent to distribute.

The defendant’s attorney initially moved to suppress the drugs and cash from introduction into evidence, based on a challenge of the traffic stop. The Judge ruled against that argument of suppression and determined that the basis for the inital traffic stop was reasonable.

At the next hearing, a second defense attorney now retained, filed a motion to challenge the reliability of the dog. The two troopers testified about the dog’s training, years of experience and his annual certification. In addition, they testified that in field training, the dog had been 100% accurate.

The evidence did show that, in the field, the dog had missed detecting marijuana once and had registered 44 out of 45 in alerting to narcotics. Yes… he missed once.

Based on prior caselaw in the Federal 4th Circuit (US v. Wu), the Court ruled that it was not persuaded by the controlled environment trooper training of the dog; but did believe that the field performance rendered the dog’s reliability within “fair probability”.  That opinion came out on June 28, 2012 which means that the case now proceeds with that evidence.

As a sidenote, I did smell popcorn in the office the other day… but I digress.

For pic o’ day, I thought I’d go with a cat who just got caught:

Please click the Facebook “Share” button below this post to let others know you enjoyed reading it. Thanks!

Comments (4)

Have You Seen Oklahoma Man?

Wednesday, June 27th, 2012

 

In a 1939 speech, Winston Churchill addressed a question about the future of Russia’s actions in World War II by saying, “I cannot forecast to you the action of Russia. It is a riddle wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma”.

This blog subject made me remember that quote. The following is an announcement that has been issued by the Oklahoma Police Department.

 

 

Oklahoma City Police and the Oklahoma State Medical Examiner’s Office are asking for the public’s help identifying a man that died 31 years ago.  On February 18th, 1981, the body of a black male was found in the 100 block of N. Bath in NE Oklahoma City.  His death was not ruled a homicide.  We are simply trying to identify the man.

Harvey Pratt with the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation has come up with a reconstruction of what this man may have looked like.  Anyone with information should contact the medical examiner’s office 405-239-7141.”

I find this announcement fascinating. There seems to be no real explanation for the announcement. Why now? The Police admit that it was not a homicide. Plus, why would they recreate something like this? Seriously… what is this? I know, it’ s styrofoam and hair made from old polyester pants. Are they trying to be funny with the police T-shirt? I guess my blog is a big question mark today.

This makes you wonder why someone is getting serious about this now… after 31 years. So, for pic o’ day I couldn’t decide whether to go with questioning skills of notice

 

Or, has anyone seen a lost cat who might be in disguise?

 

Please click the Facebook “Share” button below this post to let others know you enjoyed reading it. Thanks!

Comments (1)

Where’s the Brownie Evidence?

Thursday, September 29th, 2011

I know that police get criticized for hanging out at the donut shops. The following involves police officers who had different eats on the mind.   This story comes from the “these aren’t your mother’s brownies” file.

Police went to an apartment complex after someone had called to report that they smelled drugs. When the police got there, they also found brownies and quizzed the occupants on ”let me guess what’s in these”. The three police officers then proceeded to eat some of the brownies.

The occupants then complained that the police had eaten “their pot brownies”. The policemen probably could have denied as “their word against a bunch of 19-year-olds”. However, after eating the brownies, the police went back to their car computers and posted messages that included the following:

“So high. Spaced out : h i g h”. Another policeman typed, “So high, good munchies”.  The reply was, “Everything should be open when we get done”.  They obviously were not thinking or they would have remembered that the department keeps all messages that are typed between police cars.

The drug possession charges against the teenagers still stand. The police officers potentially face charges of destroying (eating) evidence. I guess it takes “Protect and Serve” to a different level; Didn’t protect the evidence; Served each other the brownies.   Instead, they should have said, “Put down the brownies and step away from the tray.”

And now, Pic o’ day.

Please click the Facebook “Share” button below this post to let others know you enjoyed reading it. Thanks!

Comments Comments Off

“Leave Me Alone”

Sunday, September 25th, 2011

     My store distractions include Staples and Office Max. I like to wander the aisles to see the new stuff in office products. That includes new things for the cubicle.

     Since the invention of the cubicle, there have been inventions for the cubicle, to create more privacy. Those include cubicle curtains and cubicle screens. Most workplaces don’t allow those. It kinda defeats the open door policy.

     The above cubicle invention did grab my attention. It’s like a police crime scene divider. Apparently, you can get all kind of messages that include “Gone to lunch”; the obligatory “please do not disturb” that you see above’ and even “gone on vacation”.

     I saw a news story of a Utah man that was basically trying to put up a divider between him and the police, that were chasing him. He just wanted them to stop chasing him, so he called the 911 dispatcher.

     Police initially thought that they were on a routine traffic stop. A driver went through radar at about 15 miles above the speed limit. When they put the siren on, they soon learned that he had no intention of stopping.

     A short time later, the dispatcher reported to the deputy that she had just received a call from the man who had said, “he was not going to stop, and to leave him alone”.

     Deputies put up some tire spikes down the road,  ahead of the driver. Just before going over the spikes, he agreed to stop and was taken into custody. He said that he was just having problems with his girlfriend “and was having a bad morning”.

     I guess we can put up ignore or “leave me alone” signs. It just doesn’t mean that they always work. Especially when we see the flashing lights in the rear view mirror.

     And now some mustard and ketchup for pic o’ day.       

 

Please click the Facebook “Share” button below this post to let others know you enjoyed reading it. Thanks!

Comments Comments Off

Freedom in/of Public for Public

Tuesday, August 30th, 2011

     A few days ago, I did a blog on the Freedom of Information Act. This follow-up blog relates to the freedom of you to personally get information, when in the public. Even when taping police officers.

      I found this article from Gizmoto.com which does a good job summarizing the Glik case involving the bystander who filmed the police, while they were arresting another individual.

     The police then arrested the bystander/cameraman for his taping. I guess police are a bit edgy about being taped. Remember  the video of the Rodney King arrest? Well, the Court said that you can, and do have the absolute freedom to tape, when you are in a public place.

     The short version is that cameras in public, have freedom to video the public. Everyone with a Smart phone, is recognized by the Court as  having a “Freedom to tape phone” . If you want a bit of the legalese, then here are the quoted words of the Court’s opinion:

“[I]s there a constitutionally protected right to videotape police carrying out their duties in public? Basic First Amendment principles, along with case law from this and other circuits, answer that question unambiguously in the affirmative.”
“Glik filmed the defendant police officers in the Boston Common, the oldest city park in the United States and the apotheosis of a public forum. In such traditional public spaces, the rights of the state to limit the exercise of First Amendment activity are ‘sharply circumscribed.’”
“[A] citizen’s right to film government officials, including law enforcement officers, in the discharge of their duties in a public space is a basic, vital, and well-established liberty safeguarded by the First Amendment.”
“Gathering information about government officials in a form that can readily be disseminated to others serves a cardinal First Amendment interest in protecting and promoting ‘the free discussion of governmental affairs.’

Now pic o’ day to help muscle up!

 

Please click the Facebook “Share” button below this post to let others know you enjoyed reading it. Thanks!

Comments Comments Off

Angry Parking Protest

Monday, August 29th, 2011

     I admit it. I used to have a bad attitude about “meter maids”. I even said things like, “They sure seem to enjoy writing those parking tickets.”

     Now, I have a different attitude. Oh, I still don’t like parking tickets.  But, I have now represented some of those nice ladies that have to ride around in those little ”vehicles” and “enforce parking regulations”.  They don’t like it either.

     Yes, I have had a change of heart. I’ve even had a change of speech in description. I still don’t come close to the guy who decided to use parking tickets as a way to protest.

      A Connecticut man   was so upset about the lack of parking enforcement that he decided to do something about it. He parked his car illegally, in a handicapped parking space. Then, he just kept calling the police. He called the police 12 times until they finally came out and arrested him. The first call came in at 2 a.m. He should have gone to Wendys for a late night frosty, instead.

     I wish I had a copy of those 911 calls. I bet the dispatcher had some priceless responses. “Sir, please don’t call again. There is no one that has reported that they want that spot right now.” 

     When the police came, they found him screaming. They had to subdue him with a stun gun because he was so combative. He was charged with breach of the peace and interfering with an officer who was trying to give him a parking ticket.

     Maybe he should have just marched around town with one of those sandwich board signs or worn one of those costumes, on the side of the road, that look like Lady Liberty . He was obviously very angry about the parking. Most people don’t even get that angry over not being able to find a Starbucks.

     Yep, pic o’ day

 

Please click the Facebook “Share” button below this post to let others know you enjoyed reading it. Thanks!

Comments Comments Off

This Sheriff is No Andy

Tuesday, February 22nd, 2011

      Actor Sean Connery  was initially offered the part of Morpheus, in the three part ”Matrix” movies. For some reason, he turned it down and all the money that went with it.

     Having not learned anything from that choice, Connery supposedly turned down the part of Gandalf, in the “ Lord of the Rings” trilogy,  because he “didn’t understand the script”.  New Line Cinema had reportedly offered him 15 percent of the box office proceeds, which means that he reportedly walked away from about $400 million.

     I was reminded of those bad money choices, when I read the story of the Beaufort County Sheriff’s deputy. (Beaufort Observer).  He was terminated and asked to reimburse the county for his local gym membership fee.

     Instead of paying back the requested $150 dollars, he decided to fight it. The County hired the law firm of Womble Carlyle.  They were successful in their representation. By the time that they took judgment against the deputy, with costs and interest, it had climbed to $245.88.

     Meanwhile, the County’s legal bill had also climbed to $5,370.67. When the deputy decided to appeal the judgment, the County ”settled” the case by choosing to mark the judgment as paid and satisfied, instead of going forward on the appeal.  They wanted to stop their legal fees.  The County Board of Commissioners then enacted a “we’ll fix that”, by requring a vote before retaining outside counsel, in the future.

     Maybe if they had thought of what Sheriff Andy Taylor would have done in Mayberry, they wouldn’t have gone after that poor deputy for his gym membership. Of course, if you remember, Sheriff Taylor made Barney carry his bullet in his shirt pocket. He knew that was a better choice of safety for the town.

Please click the Facebook “Share” button below this post to let others know you enjoyed reading it. Thanks!

Comments Comments Off

Did You Miss This News?

Tuesday, June 15th, 2010

     There are some places where you just shouldn’t get into a food fight. A Wendy’s Drive-thru is on that list. Here is the Yahoo report  about Michigan customers who were arrested, and charged with assault on Wendys’ employees. 

     It all started with four hungry people, probably craving a bacon and mushroom, sitting in one vehicle, at the Drive-thru. They claimed that their order was wrong. So far, no news there.  Then, they hurled drinks, hamburgers and fries at the employee standing at the window. The employee fired food, ketchup and fries back at the vehicle.

     The four then went inside and started hurling chairs and got in a fight with the employees. Two of the customers were charged with assault. The employees blamed the fight on a communication breakdown. No word on whether the song,  ”Everybody was Kung Fu fighting” was playing over the intercom.

     Now, moving on to news 2 story, from the State of South Carolina. Imagine going to the animal shelter. You have talked your child out of a pony. (Do kids still want a pony) They now are excited about helping to rescue a homeless animal.

     The animal shelter employee walks you by the first row of cages and you see some cute dogs come up to the cage bars. Not wanting to be too hasty, you move to the next row where you hear the purring and meowing of the cats.  All of a sudden, you think you hear a strange scratching and a noise that sounds like a rooster. Is it your imagination?  No, you have wandered into the animal shelter in Greenville, South Carolina.

     On June 6, Greenville County Deputies broke up a cock fight, arrested 85 people and seized 145 roosters. All but 12 of the roosters were euthanized and those 12 are now being held at the animal shelter. I suspect that they will be evidence in the cockfighting trial. I don’t think that they are there waiting for public defenders, since they can’t afford attorneys.

     In cockfighting, spectators typically pay an admission and bet on the fights. The birds have spurs on their legs and they fight until the death. The owner(s) of the winning (living) birds keep a portion of the fees and bets. There are even referees who get paid for officiating.

     In South Carolina, you rarely see a story like this because there are few arrests. Law enforcement says that arrests are few because  “cockfighting groups” move around a lot, are secretive and stay in rural areas. Of course, the fact that the University of South Carolina is still known as the “Cocks”, named after the roosters in cockfighting, suggests to me that such fighting is still strangely acceptable. What if Furman decides to be called the Furman Fightin’ Pit Bulls? Would it be any different?

     To get an idea on how some in South Carolina have reacted to these arrests and this story,  you can click on the pasted article from Greenville Online. The comments range from, “They are wasting our tax dollars” to “Instead of killing those roosters, they should have returned them to their owners. At least they would have a good home”. Even better, “Why are they on these people. The stock market is gambling too.”  Hard to reason with that kind of thinking.  

     Some recent comments to the blog have asked me to take more specific positions in my posts. It’s true, I do like to stimulate thought rather than convince, but in this story, animal cruelty should not go unpunished. I hope that they make such conduct a felony in South Carolina. In addition, University of South Carolina should change their name. How about the USC Mountain Dews or the USC Spurriers (for the ole ball coach).

Please click the Facebook “Share” button below this post to let others know you enjoyed reading it. Thanks!

Comments (11)